Letter of Recommendation
Rubric
| |
Does Not Meet the Standard |
Partially Meets the Standard |
Meets the Standard |
Exceeds the Standard |
| Content |
1 reason given
or
no supporting details used |
2 reasons given
or
few supporting details used
|
3 reasons given with supporting details for each reason |
More than 3 reasons given
or
Supporting details used effectively
|
Accuracy
and
Relevancy
|
Little or no information provided is accurate
or
Little or no information provided is relevant |
Most information provided is accurate
or
Most information provided is relevant
|
Information provided is fully accurate and relevant. |
Information provided is fully accurate and relevant. Information goes beyond basic knowledge. |
| Mechanics |
It is difficult to understand the message of the piece due to the mechanical errors. Proper letter format was not used. |
There are many mechanical errors. More editing was needed. Proper letter format was attempted, but not fully used. |
There are only minor mechanical errors that do not interfere with the message of the writing. Proper letter format was used. |
There are no mechanical errors. Proper letter format was used. |
Innovator Profile Rubric
| |
Does Not Meet the Standard |
Partially Meets the Standard |
Meets the Standard |
Exceeds the Standard |
| Content |
Innovator Profile addresses none of the required aspects, as identified in the handout. |
Innovator Profile addresses some of the required aspects, as identified in the handout. |
Innovator Profile addresses all of the required aspects, as identified in the handout. |
Innovator Profile addresses all of the required aspects, as identified in the handout. Information is detailed and interesting. |
Accuracy
and
Relevancy |
Little or no information provided is accurate
or
Little or no information provided is relevant |
Most information provided is accurate
or
Most information provided is relevant |
Information provided is fully accurate and relevant. |
Information provided is fully accurate and relevant. Information goes beyond basic knowledge. |
| Mechanics |
It is difficult to understand the message of the piece due to the mechanical errors. |
There are many mechanical errors. More editing was needed. |
There are only minor mechanical errors that do not interfere with the message of the writing. |
There are no mechanical errors. |
Model Rubric
| |
Does Not Meet the Standard |
Partially Meets the Standard |
Meets the Standard |
Exceeds the Standard |
| Accuracy |
The model is an inacurate representation. |
The model is a fairly accurate representation. |
The model is an accurate representation. |
The model is an accurate representation, with attention to details of the invention. |
| How the Invention Works |
The model does not show how the invention works. |
The model shows how the invention works, but it is hard to understand. |
The model shows how the invention works. |
The model clearly shows how the invention works. |
Neatness/
Creativity
|
The model lacks neatness and creativity. |
The model is fairly neat and creative. |
The model looks neat and is creative. |
The model shows outstanding attention to neatness and creativity. |